Lowell

Lowell
Lost Valley 2010

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Inside Out Review: Pixar Plays With Our Emotions Again (This Time Literally)


It's been an interesting year for blockbuster movies... Heck, movies in general. The summer just started, and already we've been revisiting familiar worlds and characters. Avengers: Age Of Ultron, Pitch Perfect 2, Mad Max: Fury Road, and Jurassic World. The latter which has already broken records as the fastest film to make...



And as I'm writing this, we'll soon be seeing the release of Ted 2, Terminator: Genisis, Minions, Mission Impossible: Rogue, Spectre (James Bond), Peanuts, and of course...



Now, we often hear people complain about a lack of originality in Hollywood.We've even admittedly had these complaints ourselves. It just feels like every ear, Hollywood is becoming more of a franchise factory, too scared to take risks on original ideas, and rely on established fanbases and guaranteed successes. 

Not to say all sequels are a bad thing. I love revisiting my favorite characters as much as anyone. In fact, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, is my most anticipated movie of 2015 (maybe ever). There's something about revisiting favorite characters that feels like catching up with old friends. 

But what about the feeling of making those same friends for the first time? What about the first time we watched Star Wars and met Luke, Han, and Leia? The feeling of discovering something new?

That's a feeling that sequels, no matter how great they can be, can not easily capture.

And yet studios insist on making sequels of successful films for as long as audiences keep buying tickets. Because it's cheaper, safer, and easier.

One studio that refuses to play it safe is Pixar Animation Studios. While most studios rely on the momentum of their franchises, Pixar has always relied on the momentum of their consistent filmography. They are the geniuses behind such gems like the Toy Story Trilogy, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, Ratatoullie, Wall-E, Up, and now Inside Out.

Last week, Pixar released their latest masterpiece, Inside Out. A story of an 11 year old girl named Riley and her emotions Joy (Amy Poehler), Sadness (Phyllis Smith), Anger (Lewis Black), Disgust (Mindy Kaling), and Fear (Bill Hader), trying to adapt to their new home in San Fransisco.

I saw it with my family for my sister's birthday in Las Vegas last week, and again yesterday with my Mom, sister, and a friend of mine. 


Those of you who follow my blog notice I don't post movie reviews that often, for many reasons. One, I try to spend as much time off my computer as I can, and enjoy my Summer vacation. Two, it's because as I mentioned, many of the fikms this year are sequels, so I'd feel like I'd have to go into a brief history about their franchises. And for a James Bond film like Spectre for example, that might take too long. Three, because I try to just enjoy movies like an audience and not a critic. 

But here's the thing. It's been a week since it came out, and I still can't stop thinking about Inside Out!  I usually just enjoy the movie (or not), leave the theater, and move on. But Inside Out is different. It stuck with me.

This is not surprising considering it's Pixar. They have connected with audiences before with brilliant concepts like toys coming to life, monsters being scared of kids more than kids are of them, a nervous father fish swimming an entire ocean to find his son, a rat who cooks, a superhero family, a robot picking up trash and falling in love, a grumpy old man who makes his house fly to fulfill his late wife's wish, and now the emotions in our heads.

In many ways, Inside Out is the quintessential Pixar movie. Because Pixar is practically famous for playing with our emotions, and this film is all about that. It answers the question we've been asking each other since the dawn of time... What the heck is going on inside our heads?

How do we form our own personalities? Why do some songs get sick in our heads? Why is it hard to stop replaying memories in our heads sometimes? Why do we get scared? Why do feel disgust? Why do we get angry? Why do we feel sad sometimes, even when we have no reason to be? Why is it so hard to be happy? Why can't we just be happy all the time?




According to Inside Out, our personality comes from our core memories, the most important moments in our lives. Like when we made our first friend. When we first scored a goal for our sport team. Our first day of school. Our emotions are in charge of the Control Center, harness our memories in Long Term, and help us to make decisions. Joy helps us to find the bright side in every situation. Fear keeps us from getting hurt or making regrettable decisions. Disgust prevents us from getting poisoned, and helps us take care of our hygene. Anger helps us to speak up when we feel things are unfair. 

But what does Sadness do? Why do we need it? That is the biggest question the film asks.

Like every Pixar film, the animation in Inside Out is flawless. From the character designs to the set designs, to the movements. The imagination and creativity the animators put in designing the inside of the human head is unlimited. Everything looks so colorful and so unique. The outside world is a little generic compared to the inside of Riley's head. But I think that was intentional, and it really works. You could watch this movie on mute, and it would still look amazing! 

The cast could not have been more perfect. They could not have found a better fit for Joy than Amy Poehler.




Amy Poehler is pretty much the embodiment of joy. Having played Leslie Knope for years in the brilliant, hilarious show Parks and Recreation (which aired its last episode earlier this year), Poehler is no stranger to playing cheerful, upbeat characters. Poehler reminds me of my favorite kind of teachers in my K-12 Grade life. The ones who saw the fun in every activity, who always had a smile on their face, and who cheered her students on. I feel like Amy Poehler would have made an excellent teacher, but just happens to work in show biz. And she excels at it!

Having starred in a successful TV show, developed her own website https://amysmartgirls.com/tag/amy-poehler/, and crushed it as co-host the Golden Globes with her best friend, Tina Fey, not once, not twice, but THREE TIMES IN A ROW, it's safe to say that Amy Poehler is one of the brightest stars in Hollywood right now.



Joy is the most important emotion in Riley's head. And since she's moving from Missouiri to start a new life in San Fransico, it appears Riley needs Joy more than ever. Now you might be thinking since Joy is supposed to be the embodiment of happiness, that she is this perfect, flawless character that the audience can't relate to. Quite the opposite actually. Joy actually does have some flaws of her own. Like she doesn't understand that there are times we need to be sad, and that we cannot control everything around us. She reminds us of all the times we've tried to pretend everything is ok, even when it's not.

Poehler told Access Hollywood that she based her performance as Joy on Tom Hanks' portrayal as Woody in the Toy Story movies. Joy, just like Woody, is a leader, who takes responsibility to their owner (Andy and Riley), tries to see the positive in everything, occasionally has a problem with letting others take the wheel, and never gives up, no matter how challenging things get. 

And if Joy is Inside Out's Woody, then Anger is its Mr. Potato Head.



Just like how Amy Pohler is perfect for Jou, Lewis Black is perfect for Anger. Those who have listened to Lewis Black's stand up know he has a signature wit, where he tackles topics like politics, socialism, etc. and has hilarious rants. He delivers many of the films funniest lines, and brings the same sarcasm and sass that made us fall in love with Don Rickles' Mr. Potato Head.



SNL Alumn Bill Hader is hilarious and lovable as Fear. He is so much like Rex in Toy Story and Piglet in Winnie the Pooh, where he is easily disturbed, and focuses on the worst possible senario. The storyboard artists and animators clearly had a lot of fun working on him. And I wouldn't be surprised if they watched Daffy Duck cartoons for inspiration.



Mindy Kaling is also great as the sarcastic Disgust. She is very fashion savvy, is really sensitive about how she and Riley appear on the surface, and is disgusted with people and things in general. And I have a feeling she'll be very popular at Hot Topic.


And then there's Sadness voiced by Phyliss Smith.


Sadness is just like Eyore, where she spends the movie moping and doping, always seeing the negative in everything. She is the complete opposite of Joy. Even though she's depressed, she still has a lot of clever lines, and has a much bigger role in the movie than it would appear. 


Both Joy and Sadness spend a good chunk of the movie together, and they both share great onscreen chemistry. Phyllis Smith's downbeat Sadness is a perfect foil for Amy Poehler's upbeat Joy.

Another character I have to mention is Bing Bon, voiced by Richard Kind.



Pixar has done a great job of keeping him a secret from the marketing, and I can see why. I won't spoil his role for you. But I will say that for anime who has had an imaginary friend in their childhood (most likely all of us), Bing Bong will strike a chord and leave a lasting impression. And Richard Kind plays him with a lot of humor and heart.

The score by Michael Giacchino might be my favorite score of the year so far. It's cheerful, whimsical, and even sad. Just like Giacchino's score in Up. Even as I'm writing this review, I have the score in my head, and it makes me smile.

The story is full of surprises and twists. I can't recall a moment Inwas bored or checking my watch. I was on board from the very moment it started!

A lot of credit goes to the performances from the cast, and the screenplay by Meg LeFauve, Josh Cooley, and Pete Doctor.

Pete Doctor is a pro at tugging at our heartstrings, with such films like Monsters, Inc. and Up. You'd have to have no soul to not even choke up at the beginning of Up! Or even, yes, the end of this movie. I won't spoil anything, but it contains Pixar's biggest tear jerking moment since the end of Toy Story 3.

This movie couldn't have come out at a better time for me. After what have been two of the hardest, most challenging years of my life. Graduating from High School, adjusting to College, making new friends, losing some, and on top of it, losing my Grandpa last September.

Like Riley in this movie, my emotions we're running wild these past two years. With Joy and Sadness missing from my headquarters on some days. 

This film taught me, and teaches the audience in general, why it's ok to feel sad, and even important.

Walt Disney himself said "For every laugh, there must also be a tear." 

We need sadness to help us cope with out problems, and make us see the good things in our lives. Out of sadness comes joy.

My Dad teaches psychology for a living, and he ate this film up! I could see him, and every other psychologist in the future, showing this to their students in class.

This film helped me to understand my emotions, and how I can control them. It made me understand why I feel them, what I should use them for, and how I can make myself a better person. 

Those have always been my favorite kind of movies. The kind that not only cheer you up, but also give you a whole new perspective on life. Pixar films have done that in the past, and this film is no exception.

And as for the short before it, Lava. Well, Hawaii has alway been my favorite vacation spot (along with Walt Disney World in Florida). It's a lovely little short about the love between two volcanos whose passion for each other  burns like lava. Although warning, the song in it is so catchy, it will be stuck in your head for a few days. But unlike the Triple Dem Gum commercial jingle in Inside Out, you won't mind having this song in your head.

Like every Pixar film before it, IO shook the industry and set a new record at the box office for the biggest opening weekend for an original film at $91 Million. Even though it was the first Pixar film to not open at #1, losing to Jurassic World, this is still a huge win not just for Pixar, but for Hollywood in general. 

It shows that there is still an appetite for original, creative ideas. That audiences still like to explore new worlds and new concepts.

True, some studios will get the message that audiences will want more Inside Out sequels. But the message I hope they get is this: That it's ok to take risks and step outside your comfort zone. Maybe just like how Riley had step out her comfort zone, maybe Hollywood should step out of its comfort zone as well.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Christopher Lee - Mortal Man, Immortal Legend


One of the worst things about growing up is being reminded that, no matter how much we love having people in our lives, they are mortal. We get so used to having then in our lives, we almost think, even wish, that they would never leave.

In 2015, we've lost not one, but multiple legends. BB King, the King of Blues. Leonard Nimoy, the famous Half-Human/Half-Vulcan, who taught us all to listen to logic, but also do what feels right. And now, Sir Christopher Lee. 

Christopher Lee passed away on Sunday, June 5. But his death was announced on Thursday, June 11. News of his death broke many fans hearts, including my own.

Tim Burton, George Lucas, Peter Jackson, Johnny Depp, Elijah Wood, and everyone else who's worked with Lee have paid their respects. I never actually met Cheistopher Lee (though I wish I did). But from what I've heard, he was just as kind and loving as he was talented.

The question is, how do you do Christopher Lee justice in a single blog post? This is a man who has literally done it all!

Christopher Lee was born May 27, 1922, in Bulgaria, Westminister, London. He served in World War for the Finnish forces, and even volunteered for the Royal Air Force (RAF). 

After the war, Christopher Lee began a career acting in cinema. His first film was Terence Young's Corridor of Mirrors (1947). His only line was "a satirical shaft meant to qualify therad's brauvra."

He also had an uncredited role in Laurence Oliver's Hamlet. His breakthrough came in 1952 when Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. began making films at the British National Studios. Lee was cast in various roles in 16 of Fairbanks' films, and even appeared with Buster Keaton. He said "it proved excellent training ground. 

In 1957, Lee began a career with Hammer Film Productions, known for
Making Gothic Horror films. Lee's first film with Hammer Productions was The Curse of Frankenstein as Frankenstien's monster, and co-starred with his best friend Peter Cushing as Baron Victor Frankenstein.



But it was his role as Dracula in Dracula (known in the United States as The Horror of Dracula) where Christopher Lee really broke out. Now for those of you who grew up in a Twilight age, Vampires back then were much different than Edward. They didn't sparkle, they didn't have abs, and they didn't fall in love with young girls... Unless their blood tasted good. Christopher Lee's Dracula, for example, was a menacing beast. He sucked the blood of poor victims, and wandered the halls with a chilling presense. He had no dialogue, but hissed. Lee reprised his role as Dracula in  Dracula: Prince of Darkness, Dracula Has Risen from the Grave, Taste the Blood of Dracula, and Scars of Dracula. No disrespect if you love Twilight. I don't mind the movies myself. But I think we can all agree who the true King of Vampires is:


Lee's other work for Hammer included The Mummy and Rasputin, the Mad Monk

Like his friend, Peter Cushing, Lee did horror films for other companies as well. His personal favorite being The Wicker Man (no, not the Nicolas Cage version) where he played Lord Summerisle. 

Lee wanted to break away from his image as Dracula, and take on more interesting role. His other roles included Eugenie, The Three Musketeers, The Four Musketeers, and The Return of the Musketeers.

In 1974, Christopher Lee got a very coveted role as a James Bond villain, assassin Francisco Scarmanga in The Man with the Golden Gun. It should be noted that Lee was step cousins with 007 author, Ian Flemming. So it was inevitable that he would get a part in the long running Spy franchise. On his performance, Lee said "In Fleming's novel he's just a West Indian thug, but in the film he's charming, elegant, amusing, lethal... I played him like the dark side of Bond."

Christopher Lee moved to the United States in 1977 to find more acting work, because he felt in London he was being type cast in horror films. 

His first US role was in the disaster film Airport, 1977. 

For years, audiences knew how scary he could be. But in 1978, Chdistopher Lee surprised everyone by how funny he could be when he hosted Saturday Night Live. As a result, he was cast in Steven Speilberg's 1941. 

George Lucas originally considered Christopher Lee for the role of Grand Moff Tarkin in Star Wars. But the role went to his best friend, Peter Cushing.

Sadly, his friend Peter Cushing passed away in 1994.

Adding to what was already an impressive resume, Christopher Lee was cast as the Evil Wizard Sauraman in the Lord of the Rings trilogy.


 Christopher Lee being cast in those films couldn't be more prefect, considering he was the only actor in the cast to have actually met  the author of those books, J.R.R. Tolkien, in real life. To say Christopher Lee was a Tolkien fan was a gross understatement. Christopher Lee read The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings once a year every year. Peter Jackson consulted with Christopher Lee when making the films. There's even a feature on the Blu-Ray where Christopher Lee translates the One Ring in ELVISH!


And Lee's passion for Middle Earth showed in his performance. His booming voice gave Sauraman gravitas and made him a serious threat to the Fellowship. He was once a good wizard, but was seduced by the power of Sauron. Which is what Frodo Baggins is in danger of. You know he's evil, but he's so charismatic, you would be tempted to agree with his views. 

Lee reprised his role for the Hobbit films, An Unexpected Journey and Battle of the Five Armies.

Because the movies were too long, Sauraman's death was unfortunately cut out of the final film, Return of the King (not that it made the film any shorter). Lee was upset at the decision, as many fans were. But luckily, Peter Jackson included his death in the Extended Editions. Everything about that scene is perfect, the dialogue, the shots, and Christopher Lee's chilling performance. Why they cut it out of the theatrical version, in my opinion, is a riddle even Bilbo and Gollum can't solve.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-9hXh2-XDDU

But Lord of the Rings wasn't the only epic saga Christopher Lee would be part of. In 2002, like his best friend, Peter Cushing, before him, Lee would join George Lucas' Star Wars saga as the ruthless Darth Tyranus! a.k.a. Count Dooku!


Now, whether you love or hate them, every Star Wars fan has strong, passionate feelings toward the Star Wars prequels. Some fans complain about a lot of things (Jar Jar Binks, Midichlorians, etc.) But I've never heard any Star Wars fan, even prequel haters, say one bad thing about Christopher Lee's portrayal as Coubt Dooku in Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith.



He brought gravitas and dedication to a role that could have easily fallen flat if given to a lesser actor. He made Count Dooku a menacing figure, and gave the Jedi a good reason to feel a disturbance in the Force. Count Dooku has a lot of similarities to famous Star Wars villain Darth Vader. He wears a cape, is in a powerful political position, is strong with the Dark Side of the Force, and actually used to be a Jedi Knight until he was seduced by the Dark Side, just like Sauraman.

Count Dooku is a foreshadowing of the path Anakin will take. Count Dooku maims Anakin in a fierce Lightsaber battle, leaving Skywalker hungry for revenge. In Sith, Anakin gets his revenge by cutting both Dooku's hands off. Palpatine insists Anakin should cut Dooku's head, and he does. This was the first step in Anakin's fall to the Dark Side.

This arc is mirrored in the Original Trilogy. Luke Skywalker goes through the same thing. He's a young Jedi who's strong with the Force, but doesn't know how to control it. He engages Vader in a fierce Lightsaber battle, and loses his right hand. He then faces Vader again in Jedi, and cuts Vader's hand off. Palpatine insists Luke should kill his father and take his place. However, unlike Anakin, Luke becomes aware of how close he is to turning to the Dark Side, and refuses. 

Many fans criticise this as a rehash, but I think it proves a point. That if we don't learn from the mistakes of the past, we'll be doomed to repeat it.

It shows how significant Count Dooku's role was in the Saga. And why Christopher Lee's performance was so perfect.

Oh yeah, and that fight he had with Yoda. I saw Attack of the Clones with my Dad in 2002. The fight between Yoda and Dooku made he audience go insane! And all these years later, that fight is still awesome! 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BvnwLLXHabg

We all wish we could work with our childhood heroes. Well, Tim Burton got to work with his not once, not twice, but FIVE times!!! Christopher Lee became Tim Burton's John Ratzenberg, and spearsd in films such as Sleepy Hallow (where he had a small role), Corpse Bride we Pastor Galswells, the Gentlemen Ghost in Sweeny Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, the Jabberwocky in Alice In Wonderland, and Willy Wonka's strict dentist father Dr. Wilbur Wonka in Burton's reimagining of Roald Dahl's Charlie In The Chocolate Factory.



Since its release, many feel divided on Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Some admire it for its quirky spirit and Bizzare tone. While others detest it for those reasons, and feel it pales in comparison to Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. While I agree it doesn't hold a candle to the Gene Wilder classic, I feel Burton's version stands on its own. And Christopher Lee's performance is definitely a highlight. Having Willy Wonka's father as a dentist, I felt, was a nice touch, as it gave Willy's character layers, and it teaches a lesson to kids on why we have to love and appreciate our parents, even when it seems like they're being too controlling.

Christopher Lee has said before that Tim Burton is his favorite director. How wonderful is it, that Tim Burton went from being a fan of Christopher Lee's, to having him as a fan, and even as a friend? Extremely. 


In December 2012, Christopher Lee released a Heavy Metal album featuring covers of Christmas songs called A Heavy Metal Christmas. Seriously, how awesome is it that Christopher Lee released a Heavy Metal album? And at 90 no less! The dude was literally a rock star!

Lee was knighted in 2009 "For Services to Drama and to Charity" by Prince Charles. 

He was married to Danish former model Birgitta Krøncke Lee and had a daughter, Christina Erika Catandini.

With a resume that included WWII Veteran, Knight, Prolofic Actor, AND Heavy Metal Artist, there was almost nothing Christopher Lee couldn't do! It seemed like Christopher Lee was immortal. 

Unfortunately, that wasn't the case.

When his best friend, Peter Cushing died, Christopher Lee said "He was really the most gentle and generous man. I have often said he died because he was too good for this world." 

So were you, Christopher Lee. So were you.

I guess we all thought, and hoped, that Christopher Lee would live forever. But luckily, thanks to his films and his legacy, he will.

RIP Christopher Lee.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_G7NVnoiMV4